cool technology things youve found

http://www.amazon.com/IBM-T221-22-2-3840x2400-Monitor/dp/B00006HS5R/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1363454333&sr=8-1&keywords=ibm+monitor


BIG FUCKING MONITOR

my first (that I can remember) purchased video card

fuckin' baller
http://www.amazon.com/ATI-Radeon-9550-256MB-Agp/dp/B000H3DVGU/ref=sr_1_1?s=electronics&ie=UTF8&qid=1363747686&sr=1-1&keywords=radeon+9550

9,216,000 PIXELS

tangy wrote:9,216,000 PIXELS

who fucking needs a girlfriend when you've got womenz rendered in 9,216,000 PIXELS

sweet wrote:

tangy wrote:9,216,000 PIXELS

who fucking needs a girlfriend when you've got womenz rendered in 9,216,000 PIXELS

tonight my monitor will be my girlfriend

Spoiler:

look at this gorgeous son of a fuck

tangy wrote:

sweet wrote:

tangy wrote:9,216,000 PIXELS

who fucking needs a girlfriend when you've got womenz rendered in 9,216,000 PIXELS

tonight my monitor will be my girlfriend

Spoiler:

look at this gorgeous son of a fuck

have a nice date!

tangy wrote:

sweet wrote:

tangy wrote:9,216,000 PIXELS

who fucking needs a girlfriend when you've got womenz rendered in 9,216,000 PIXELS

tonight my monitor will be my girlfriend

Spoiler:

look at this gorgeous son of a fuck

holy shit and they're trying to use that thing in that resolution with a fucking x500 radeon

sweet wrote:

tangy wrote:

sweet wrote:

tangy wrote:9,216,000 PIXELS

who fucking needs a girlfriend when you've got womenz rendered in 9,216,000 PIXELS

tonight my monitor will be my girlfriend

Spoiler:

look at this gorgeous son of a fuck

holy shit and they're trying to use that thing in that resolution with a fucking x500 radeon

he's using what appears to be debian with TWM, he'll be fine

this sucker actually came out back around 2001

oh and this monitor also has way higher pixel density than a typical one, which means IBM had that 'retina display' bullshit down before apple could scratch on it

ive found no cool technology :(

tangy wrote:oh and this monitor also has way higher pixel density than a typical one, which means IBM had that 'retina display' bullshit down before apple could scratch on it

the only reason why anybody would credit the retina display would be it's lower cost than something like this

but that's where the credit ends

sweet wrote:

tangy wrote:oh and this monitor also has way higher pixel density than a typical one, which means IBM had that 'retina display' bullshit down before apple could scratch on it

the only reason why anybody would credit the retina display would be it's lower cost than something like this

but that's where the credit ends

there are defenitely people who think high pixel density is apple's doing

it's like people who think they invented the graphical user interface or set the standard for personal computing

sweet wrote:

tangy wrote:oh and this monitor also has way higher pixel density than a typical one, which means IBM had that 'retina display' bullshit down before apple could scratch on it

the only reason why anybody would credit the retina display would be it's lower cost than something like this

but that's where the credit ends

giving Apple credit for pixel density-to-cost ratio is about as logical as crediting the Ford Pinto for being safer than a car from the late 19th century built by orphans

salty wrote:giving Apple credit for pixel density-to-cost ratio is about as logical as crediting the Ford Pinto for being safer than a car from the late 19th century built by orphans

hey
give the pinto some credit at least it fucking tried even though it was really shit at trying too

appaloosa horse wrote:

salty wrote:giving Apple credit for pixel density-to-cost ratio is about as logical as crediting the Ford Pinto for being safer than a car from the late 19th century built by orphans

hey
give the pinto some credit at least it fucking tried even though it was really shit at trying too

and it had a cool name

tangy wrote:

appaloosa horse wrote:

salty wrote:giving Apple credit for pixel density-to-cost ratio is about as logical as crediting the Ford Pinto for being safer than a car from the late 19th century built by orphans

hey
give the pinto some credit at least it fucking tried even though it was really shit at trying too

and it had a cool name

my dad drove a 72 pinto as his first car

sweet wrote:

tangy wrote:

appaloosa horse wrote:

salty wrote:giving Apple credit for pixel density-to-cost ratio is about as logical as crediting the Ford Pinto for being safer than a car from the late 19th century built by orphans

hey
give the pinto some credit at least it fucking tried even though it was really shit at trying too

and it had a cool name

my dad drove a 72 pinto as his first car

didnt pintos explode if they got rear-ended

name a manlier car than that, that's the finest example of grabbing life by the balls

also the person who rear ended you would probably get cought in the explosion and die with you

tangy wrote:also the person who rear ended you would probably get cought in the explosion and die with you

suicide bombers would have a fucking field day if the pinto weren't long gone

tangy wrote:

sweet wrote:

tangy wrote:

appaloosa horse wrote:

salty wrote:giving Apple credit for pixel density-to-cost ratio is about as logical as crediting the Ford Pinto for being safer than a car from the late 19th century built by orphans

hey
give the pinto some credit at least it fucking tried even though it was really shit at trying too

and it had a cool name

my dad drove a 72 pinto as his first car

didnt pintos explode if they got rear-ended

name a manlier car than that, that's the finest example of grabbing life by the balls

also the person who rear ended you would probably get cought in the explosion and die with you

my dad was fucking brave considering he was only 17 or so when he had it

then he got the 73 mustang a few years later

which is still the best and in fact is in the garage