rise of nations

spinny and epoch you would love this

it's age of empires with the real time aspects but with all of the neat shit from civilization like modern units and wonders and shit

here's a screenshot of my last game i crushed those nerds

at the very end of the game, you get to pick a future technology (you can research all of them but you need fuckloads of time and thousands of all resources)

missile shield prevents icbms and cruise missiles from landing in your territory

illuminati government thing makes all victory countdowns instant

global commerce or whatever gives you stealth bombers that can only be hurt by jets and unstoppable fighter jets that are better than normal jets and makes your resource limit per second +999 and gives you 50% more per second

artificial intelligence makes everything spawn instantly when you queue it

yeah this dude was telling me about it last night

i spent an hour fixing my dvd drive for this yesterday, it was totally worth it

its so glorious and the graphics are pretty too for a 2003 game

launching a nuclear icbm against a motherfucker who tried to destroy your tank with musketeers

No Linux port

it was published by microshit of course there ain't haha

its worth running on your windoze 8 pc though

yeah when you mentioned this i looked it up it looks cool

seth wrote:its worth running on your windoze 8 pc though

too bad his surface cant run it anyway

a 2003 game won't run?

it works on windoze 8, i checked nerd

here's a screenshot with stealth bombers crushing spain hard

spinnythings wrote:

seth wrote:its worth running on your windoze 8 pc though

too bad his surface cant run it anyway

if I had a surface pro

ohh yaa

i forgot you have the arm version

seth wrote:i forgot you have the arm version

RT

even RT was x86 compatible i still wouldnt be able to cuz you cant install desktop apps on it so whatevs

ammmmy wrote:

seth wrote:i forgot you have the arm version

RT

even RT was x86 compatible i still wouldnt be able to cuz you cant install desktop apps on it so whatevs

rt uses an arm processor, doesn't it?

seth wrote:

ammmmy wrote:

seth wrote:i forgot you have the arm version

RT

even RT was x86 compatible i still wouldnt be able to cuz you cant install desktop apps on it so whatevs

rt uses an arm processor, doesn't it?

it does

seth wrote:a 2003 game won't run?

it works on windoze 8, i checked nerd

well because of the surface's processor it cant run certain applications
this is coming from my brother and dad who both own surface 1 and 2

spinnythings wrote:

seth wrote:a 2003 game won't run?

it works on windoze 8, i checked nerd

well because of the surface's processor it cant run certain applications
this is coming from my brother and dad who both own surface 1 and 2

hes saying it runs on windows 8 in general hes not talking about surfaces

it will run on surface pro because it has an x86-64 processor and won't on RT because of a variety of reasons, namely the ARM architecture is incompatible with x86 and RT doesnt let you install 3rd party applications to the desktop interface

there might be compatibility issues with running it on 8 on a desktop, had some troubles getting TH06 to work like it should on 8

also getting an X86 application to run on ARM is as easy as compiling the source code on an ARM processor

it's a little more complicated than that since arm processors have different architecture for that assembly code to compile to (endianness for example is a tiny change but it's the difference between 1000 and 0001)

if the software was designed to be cross-architecture, it is that simple, though

seth wrote:it's a little more complicated than that since arm processors have different architecture for that assembly code to compile to (endianness for example is a tiny change but it's the difference between 1000 and 0001)

if the software was designed to be cross-architecture, it is that simple, though

Quit using shitty compilers;-, nerd.

i've never had a problem with cross-architecture compilation

ammmmy wrote:

seth wrote:it's a little more complicated than that since arm processors have different architecture for that assembly code to compile to (endianness for example is a tiny change but it's the difference between 1000 and 0001)

if the software was designed to be cross-architecture, it is that simple, though

Quit using shitty compilers;-, nerd.

i've never had a problem with cross-architecture compilation

most software designed in the early 2000s era was not designed to run on arm bud

seth wrote:

ammmmy wrote:

seth wrote:it's a little more complicated than that since arm processors have different architecture for that assembly code to compile to (endianness for example is a tiny change but it's the difference between 1000 and 0001)

if the software was designed to be cross-architecture, it is that simple, though

Quit using shitty compilers;-, nerd.

i've never had a problem with cross-architecture compilation

most software designed in the early 2000s era was not designed to run on arm bud

You don't have access to the source code to compile it for ARM in the first place; bud